No, this newsletter is not a commentary on the ubiquitous if dehumanizing television shows highlighting the human fascination with and faculty for videotaping stupid human acts, seemingly contradicting Darwian evolution.
It is, however, a newsletter discussing the significance, if at all, of a recent Pennsylvania Superior Court opinion, in Ahmed Tagouma v. Investigative Consultant Services, Inc., circulated on August 10, 2010, beggaring/questioning the stupidity of irrational appeals, for which the ultimate question becomes, “for who, for what?”.